JBL maintains a record of providing strong wireless earbuds to their fan base.
Both the JBL Tune Beam and JBL Tune 245 NC share such identical appearances that I found it difficult to differentiate them on first sight.
Time spent with these two models taught me about different features which could assist you in choosing the proper device.
Build and Design
Let’s start with how these earbuds look and feel. Honestly, they are almost identical.
Same size, same shape, and even the cases have “JBL Tune” written on the back.
If you put the earbuds in each other’s case, they still fit perfectly. That’s something you don’t see often.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da9e8/da9e86ad12d36bc2fd5171c5f87d768495fc268d" alt="JBL Tune Beam vs Tune 245 NC"
Both have a matte finish with the JBL logo and an LED light on the front. The design is clean, minimal, and pocket-friendly.
If you’ve used the older JBL Tune 230 NC, you’ll notice these two have a slightly different design. But between the Beam and 245 NC, there’s no real difference in looks.
Features and App Support
JBL’s app works with both models, and the features are nearly identical. Here’s what you get:
- Battery level indicators for both earbuds and the case
- ANC (Active Noise Cancellation) and Ambient Aware mode
- TalkThru mode for conversations without removing your earbuds
- Adjustable EQ settings to fine-tune your sound
- Customizable touch controls for volume, playback, and ambient modes
- Google Assistant and native voice assistant support
- A volume limiter to protect your ears
- “Find My Buds” to locate misplaced earbuds
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3504a/3504a1f7b9b764b4dc756c7f8c293a10a988597f" alt="JBL Tune Beam vs Tune 245 NC"
Since both earbuds offer the same set of features, there’s no clear winner here.
Noise Cancellation and Call Quality
The ANC features on both the Tune Beam and Tune 245 NC yield similar performance levels according to my experience.
These earbuds successfully block background sounds during commuting and while working in a café environment as well as while attempting to block out ambient noises.
They won’t match premium ANC earbuds like the Sony WF-1000XM5, but for the price, they’re impressive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79cfb/79cfb8b60a0c1846615a567b3775962b752816ac" alt="JBL Tune Beam vs Tune 245 NC"
For calls, both models hold up well. They do a good job filtering out background noise, whether you’re taking a call in a busy street or at home.
The Tune 245 NC might have a slight edge in noise handling, but honestly, the difference is hard to notice in regular use.
Battery Life
JBL claims both models have similar battery life, and from my testing, that checks out. Expect around 10 hours from the earbuds alone, with the case giving you an extra 30 hours.
Of course, turning ANC on will shave off a couple of hours, but overall, battery performance is solid.
Sound Quality
Here’s where I noticed a small difference. Both earbuds deliver JBL’s signature sound—punchy bass, clear mids, and crisp highs.
But the Tune 245 NC sounds just a bit sharper. It has slightly more detail in the treble and a touch more energy in the bass.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ac09/8ac09e0d3c28be4b374cb87da5420061239b791d" alt="JBL Tune Beam vs Tune 245 NC"
The Tune Beam, on the other hand, feels a little more relaxed and smooth.
If you like extra clarity in vocals and instruments, you might prefer the 245 NC.
But if you want a more balanced and warm sound, the Tune Beam could be the better pick.
Why Does JBL Have Both?
I think the Tune 245 NC exists to fix some of the issues JBL had with the older Tune Beam and Tune 230 NC.
The 230 NC had charging and connectivity issues, and while the Beam improved on that, there were still some complaints.
The 245 NC seems like JBL’s way of refining the experience even further.
JBL Tune Beam vs Tune 245 NC: Specs Comparison
Feature | JBL Tune Beam | JBL Tune 245 NC |
---|---|---|
Fit | In the Ear | In the Ear |
Water Resistance | Yes, IP54 Rated | Not specified |
Frequency Response | 20 Hz – 20,000 Hz | 20 Hz – 20,000 Hz |
Impedance | 16 Ohms | 16 Ohms |
Sensitivity | 97 dB/mW | 97 dB/mW |
Driver Type | Dynamic | Not specified |
Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Bluetooth Range | 10 meters | 10 meters |
Playback Time | 48 hours | 48 hours |
Charging Time | 2 hours | 2 hours |
Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
Weight | 60 grams | 74 grams |
Colors Available | Black, White, Beige, Mint | Black |
Price | $99.95 | Around $70 |
Which One Should You Get?
After using both, I’d say they are nearly identical in most aspects. If you like a slightly sharper sound with more detail, go for the Tune 245 NC. If you prefer a smoother and more laid-back sound, the Tune Beam is a great choice.
Either way, both are solid earbuds that deliver great sound, decent ANC, and a comfortable fit. If you find one on a better deal, go for it—you won’t be disappointed.
Related:
- JBL Wave Flex vs Tune Beam vs Live Free 2: Which is Right for You?
- JBL Wave Buds vs Wave Beam vs Tune 230 NC: Comparison
- JBL Wave Buds vs QCY Melobuds Neo: Which Should You Buy?
- Xiaomi Redmi Buds 5 Pro vs JBL Wave Buds: Which to Buy?
Nick, the Co-founder of Earbuds Arena, is a seasoned freelance tech journalist with over ten years of experience covering wearables, apps, headphones, and gadgets. When he’s not immersed in the tech world, you’ll likely find him unwinding with video games, going for a run, or enjoying a game of soccer on the field.